0

The Catholic Church is no stranger to controversy, especially when it comes to background screening.  For years the public demanded better screening of Priests and other congregant workers.   These demands and other public pressures is likely why they adopted a policy a few years back.  However, as we can see here, when Ms. Collins was hired in June 2003, background checks were not common practice in the church.  Like we always say, money is easy(ier) to recover than ones reputation.   Careless oversight and lack screening policies have led them to where they are today.  As you will read later in the article, a simple criminal records check on Ms. Collins would have revealed a past recrod; According to court records, Ms. Collins was arrested in June 1999, and charged with stealing at least $46,000 over 16 months from AccuStaff, a Manhattan temporary employment agency where she worked as a payroll manager.

In Million-Dollar Theft Case, Church Worker With a Secret Past

For eight years, the woman worked in accounts payable for the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of New York, gaining the trust of her superiors.
Colleagues praised her quiet dedication and hard work, and noted that she prayed often; her volunteer work at an event at St. Patrick’s Cathedral won mention in the church’s newspaper, Catholic New York. No one, then, questioned the hundreds of checks she wrote at the archdiocese to cover small expenses, like office supplies and utility bills.
On Monday, the woman, Anita Collins, 67, was charged with embezzling more than $1 million over seven years from the archdiocese.
Prosecutors in Manhattan said she did not live lavishly. But at her modest home in the Throgs Neck section of the Bronx, a particular interest of Ms. Collins’s became apparent: expensive dolls.
Detectives emerged from her three-bedroom apartment on Monday carrying boxes filled with personal effects: 17 or 18 were labeled dolls, many from the Madame Alexander catalog; about three more were labeled bears. And when a postal service carrier walked by, she noted the volume of mail and packages that the family received.
“They get packages like no tomorrow,” she said.
Joseph Zwilling, a spokesman for the archdiocese, said Ms. Collins was confronted about the missing money in December after an annual audit raised red flags. She was fired, and the archdiocese referred the matter to the Manhattan district attorney, Cyrus R. Vance Jr.
When Ms. Collins was hired by the archdiocese in June 2003, it did not perform criminal background checks on prospective employees, as it does now, Mr. Zwilling said. So church officials were unaware until recently that she had been convicted of grand larceny in one case and had pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor in another.
Mr. Zwilling said the scheme diverted money “designated for the purpose of helping to provide Catholic education.” The archdiocese has been closing churches and schools for lack of money, and asking for more than $15 million in an annual charity appeal.
“We are continually reviewing how money is handled, our financial controls,” Mr. Zwilling said, “because we want to be good stewards of the money entrusted to us.”
Prosecutors said Ms. Collins had issued 468 checks from the archdiocese to “KB Collins,” the initials of one of her sons. After each check was printed, she would change internal records to show that the check had been issued to a legitimate vendor, prosecutors said.
“At first, we thought it was only a handful of checks, but we quickly realized that it was much bigger,” Mr. Zwilling said.
She kept the amounts to less than $2,500 each to avoid the approval of a supervisor required for larger checks, a prosecutor, Amy Justiniano, said during Ms. Collins’s arraignment.
Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • RSS
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • MySpace
  • NewsVine
  • Ping.fm
  • Reddit
  • Scoopeo
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
Share This Post

Continue Reading

1

Screenshot of webinar

At long last, we are finally posting the recorded version of our webinar, “Your Applicants Have Something to Hide: Why You’re Not Finding It”.  Check on our description below and click on any one of the hyperlinks to the webinar landing page.

A school teacher is accused of striking a child. The background check had reported no record of criminal activity; however, a school investigation following the incident reveals that the teacher had a pending assault and battery case..

Sadly, background check horror stories are more common than you think. Don’t let it happen to you!

Drawing from 13 years of experience, EmployeeScreenIQ’s webinar explains how to ensure accurate criminal background checks. You’ll also learn:

  • Why taking “shortcuts” can lead to compromised background checks
  • How companies can inadvertently hire violent criminals
  • How to maintain a positive candidate experience, even if negative results are revealed
Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • RSS
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • MySpace
  • NewsVine
  • Ping.fm
  • Reddit
  • Scoopeo
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
Share This Post

Continue Reading

0

We just published The Verifier XXIV, Fall 2011 Edition, a publication intended as an educational tool and information resource for human resource professionals or anyone interested in keeping abreast of recent employment screening and background check industry developments.

Highlights of this issue include the following:

Articles:

Announcements and Legislative Updates

Check it out!

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • RSS
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • MySpace
  • NewsVine
  • Ping.fm
  • Reddit
  • Scoopeo
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
Share This Post

Continue Reading

0

Over the past few years we have written countless posts about the EEOC and various State governments seeking to be progressive and give those with criminal records a second chance.  Their intentions are always good, however, we all know how this story ends.  I certainly don’t argue the merits of their ambition to make good for all in the world, but….the old adage; screw me once, shame on you, do it twice shame on me, seems to fit nicely here.

The Rhode Island Public Transit Authority (RIPTA) has now come under scrutiny because they hired two men with previous criminal records.  Again, a valiant effort to progressively make the world a better place, but, as we have always said, not everyone is suited for every position.  Should these men have been placed in this particular job? Should they have been given a second chance? Not our call to make, however, I think the EEOC will have a position or argument if they make future decisions based on this situation.  Time will tell!

According to WPRI.com Eyewitness News; RIPTA hired two ex-convicts as drivers for their RIde program, which serves the elderly and disabled. The men had lengthy criminal records and had served time at the ACI. They said the men profiled in the piece are no longer behind the wheel of a RiDe bus, but it is unclear if they were given job placement elsewhere within the agency.

The entire story reminds me of an old quote by Albert Camus;
“The evil that is in the world almost always comes of ignorance, and good intentions may do as much harm as malevolence if they lack understanding.”

RIPTA puts brakes on hiring people with criminal records

The head of the Rhode Island Public Transit Authority has come under fire after the agency hired two men with criminal records to drive buses transporting the elderly and disabled.

Chief Executive Charles Odimgbe described it as a pilot program that has been discontinued. He said it reintegrated former criminals into society.

Thomas Deller, chairman of the agency’s board, praised the program. But board member Maureen Martin told Odimgbe that hiring men with criminal records raises passenger safety issues.

The Amalgamated Transit Union accuses Odimgbe of undermining bus service through attempted cost-savings.

The board on Monday did not discuss the hirings, first reported by WPRI. Deller says the board will take up the question another time.

The Senate Committee on Housing will investigate.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • RSS
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • MySpace
  • NewsVine
  • Ping.fm
  • Reddit
  • Scoopeo
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
Share This Post

Continue Reading

0

Just a reminder to sign up for EmployeeScreenIQ’s online learning session on how to maximize the affect of your criminal background check.  Here’s the intro and the info below.

A school teacher is accused of striking a child. The background check had reported no record of criminal activity; however, a school investigation following the incident reveals that the teacher had a pending assault and battery case..

Sadly, background check horror stories are more common than you think. Don’t let it happen to you!

No Shortcuts
Your Applicants Have Something to Hide: Why You’re Not Finding It.
Date: Thursday, November 17, 2011
Time: 1:00 PM – 2:00 PM EDT
Cost: FREE
Register here: https://www1.gotomeeting.com/register/681781352

Drawing from 13 years of experience, EmployeeScreenIQ’s webinar will explain how to ensure accurate criminal background checks. You’ll also learn:

  • Why taking “shortcuts” can lead to compromised background checks
  • How companies can inadvertently hire violent criminals
  • How to maintain a positive candidate experience, even if negative results are revealed

Download the Whitepaper now!
Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • RSS
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • MySpace
  • NewsVine
  • Ping.fm
  • Reddit
  • Scoopeo
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
Share This Post

Continue Reading

2

A school teacher is accused of striking a child. The background check had reported no record of criminal activity; however, a school investigation following the incident reveals that the teacher had a pending assault and battery case..

Sadly, background check horror stories are more common than you think. Don’t let it happen to you!

No Shortcuts
Your Applicants Have Something to Hide: Why You’re Not Finding It.
Date: Thursday, November 17, 2011
Time: 1:00 PM – 2:00 PM EDT
Cost: FREE
Register here: https://www1.gotomeeting.com/register/681781352

Drawing from 13 years of experience, EmployeeScreenIQ’s webinar will explain how to ensure accurate criminal background checks. You’ll also learn:

  • Why taking “shortcuts” can lead to compromised background checks
  • How companies can inadvertently hire violent criminals
  • How to maintain a positive candidate experience, even if negative results are revealed

Download the Whitepaper now!
Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • RSS
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • MySpace
  • NewsVine
  • Ping.fm
  • Reddit
  • Scoopeo
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
Share This Post

Continue Reading

0

According to People Magazine (yes, I really just quoted People), Top Chef finalist, Morgan Wilson has been indicted on charges of possession and intent to distribute child pornography.

Now, to be fair to the Bravo television network, it looks like the arrest took place after the show was aired last fall.  However, Wilson does hold a job with the Ritz Carlton hotel in Dallas.

So, here’s the question.  Should the hotel have known about this arrest?  Well, he was hired in 2007, so a background check at that time wouldn’t have revealed these charges.  It is, however surprising that the hotel wouldn’t have heard about this before the indictment was announced earlier this month given Wilson’s high profile status.

Okay, so let’s say that the hotel wasn’t aware of the arrest and charges.  What could they have done?  Many organizations are now performing criminal background checks on their employees on a regularly scheduled basis to ensure that nothing has changed since the time of their hiring.  Now, I certainly can’t fault the Ritz for not doing this, since those that do are still in the minority.  Just something to think about though.  In this case, it certainly might have helped keep their name out of the papers.

P.S. Not that the allegations against Chef Robert Irvine for resume fraud were even close to as serious, but this isn’t the first time a television chef has fallen from grace.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • RSS
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • MySpace
  • NewsVine
  • Ping.fm
  • Reddit
  • Scoopeo
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
Share This Post

Continue Reading

1

Well let’s chalk this one up to a bad candidate experience.  Mike Bauer was recently awarded a $75,000 judgment because he was incarcerated for 37 days after an employment background check erroneously indicated that he failed to pay child support.

And while we usually blame the screening company or the employer for mistakes such as these, in this instance, it was the Jefferson County, MO court who made the mistake.

The article doesn’t say why or how Bauer was arrested, but I suppose the company that wanted to hire him must have alerted the authorities.  Not only did it take 37 days to determine that the conviction didn’t belong to him, but as a result he lost his job and his home.

Yikes!

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • RSS
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • MySpace
  • NewsVine
  • Ping.fm
  • Reddit
  • Scoopeo
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
Share This Post

Continue Reading

0

Everything is big in Texas . . . Including a gaping wide hole in the state’s Department of Public Safety Computerized Criminal History System (DPS).  A 2009 state audit revealed that state prosecutors and courts failed to report arrest records on 1 in 4 arrests.  That might be funny if prospective foster parents, teacher applicants, members of law enforcement, day-care employees, doctors, nurses and real estate agents weren’t mandated to use the system for background checks let alone a host of private sector employers who do so voluntarily.

And here’s where it gets really scary.  The audit also looked at 21,351 offenders in jail, in prison or on probation who were convicted of crimes and began serving sentences in November of 2009. There were court records in the system for 1,634 of those offenders.

We’ve often warned about the dangers of relying on state database systems to conduct criminal background checks and this gives you a snapshot as to why.  Is the state’s criminal database cheap?  It sure is, but now maybe you can see why you get what you pay for.

And while, the statewide search might be a good screening tool as a complement to a thorough criminal background check, the gold standard is still to conduct a county criminal record search in each county where an individual has resided.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • RSS
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • MySpace
  • NewsVine
  • Ping.fm
  • Reddit
  • Scoopeo
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
Share This Post

Continue Reading

2

Don’t know Ricky McCalenton?  That’s okay, neither do we.  Ricky is just an average guy in Cleveland, Ohio that recognizes the effectiveness of “Ban the Box” legislation.  He summed it all up in just one simple quote to the Cleveland Plain Dealer on a story they had written about the city’s recent legislation to remove the question which asks the job applicant to reveal any past criminal records.

“The intentions are real good, them saying, ‘I’m not going to look at your criminal background right now,” said Cleveland resident Ricky McCalenton. “But once I get you into the job site, and I do a background check, I’m going to have to fire you.’ So to me, honestly, I think they should have left it on there.”

The only thing I would quibble on is that any criminal record would be grounds for termination, but he gets it.

As far as “Ban the Box” legislation is concerned, it is certainly a concept that is picking up speed and one that we highlighted on our 2011 Background Screening Trends list earlier this year.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • RSS
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • MySpace
  • NewsVine
  • Ping.fm
  • Reddit
  • Scoopeo
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
Share This Post

Continue Reading

All information contained on this website is provided by employeescreenIQ solely for the convenience of the site viewers. employeescreenIQ is not providing legal advice or counsel and nothing provided on this website or otherwise by employeescreenIQ should be deemed as legal guidance or advice. Users are solely responsible for complying with all local, state, and federal laws relating to the use of any information provided on this website and any information products provided by employeescreenIQ. Users should consult with their own legal counsel if they have questions regarding their legal responsibilities or any information provided by employeescreenIQ.