Background Checks May Not Be the Myers-Briggs Test—4 Reasons They’re Better
August 1, 2014
Surely you’ve heard of the Myers-Briggs test—an assessment that categorizes people into 16 different personality types, the results supposedly able to determine the types of jobs that would be best for you. However, a recent article reveals this test may not be as telling as many employers—and others, once believed and reports, “Analysis shows the test is totally ineffective at predicting people’s success at various jobs.” And yet, many companies continue to spend money on this test and trust in its ability to reveal a person’s personality and behavior.Read More
San Francisco “Ban the Box” Effective on August 13, 2014
July 31, 2014
Things aren’t getting any easier for employers in California. As I posted way back in February, San Francisco has banned the box. Effective August 13, 2014, employers in the city or county of San Francisco may no longer inquire about criminal history on employment applications or during interviews. It’s Ban the Box on steroids, and it may be coming to a city near you.
Titled The San Francisco Fair Chance Ordinance, No. 17-14, the new law prohibits both private and public employers with at least 20 employees from asking about a criminal past on the job application or in an initial interview. The law also restricts asking about criminal history on applications for affordable housing within the city. With respect to employment, the law applies to temporary workers, contract workers, and city contractors and subcontractors. The proponents of this and similar laws are trying to give ex-offenders a second chance by deferring questions about criminal history until after the application stage of hiring.Read More
July BTW: Two New FCRA Class Actions & The Problem with Ban the Box
July 17, 2014
For those interested in staying up-to-date with the latest in compliance for pre-employment background screening and the laws that affect your use of employment background checks, follow our publication, BTW: Your Guide to Staying Out of Hot Water. This compliance resource has been created by our VP of Compliance and General Counsel, Angela Preston, and is a must-read for human resources and security professionals. The Sharks are Circling: Two New FCRA Class Actions
Just when you thought it was safe to get back in the water, the sharks are circling with more FCRA-related class action claims. This time Home Depot and Aaron’s furniture stores are the companies under attack. Read MoreRead More
The Sharks are Circling: Two New FCRA Class Actions
Just when you thought it was safe to get back in the water, the sharks are circling with more FCRA-related class action claims. This time Home Depot and Aaron’s furniture stores are the companies under attack. Just a couple weeks ago, when most Americans were cutting out of work early to get to their July 4th parties, these two retailers were hit with class action lawsuits alleging violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) in their background screening process.
This is a continuation of the wave of FCRA class action lawsuits that I have written about all too often in the past year. Investing in some preventive FCRA compliance measures this summer can really pay off, especially since the litigation continues—and recent settlements are costing employers millions of dollars.Read More
The Problem(s) with Ban the Box
July 16, 2014
Ban the box has gone viral. And while the removal of this little check box has potentially made life easier for job seekers with a criminal past, it has created much confusion and frustration for employers. If you haven’t been in the loop, “ban the box” is the catchy phrase that refers to removal of the check box on a job application asking whether a candidate has been convicted of a crime. Ban the box shows no signs of slowing down, and it’s creating new headaches, not to mention real risks, for employers across the country.Read More
Ban the Box Update: Rochester, DC, New Jersey, and Illinois
Another day, another dollar. And another ban the box bill.
The city of Rochester has banned the box, joining other US cities like Buffalo, Baltimore, Newark, Philadelphia, San Francisco, and Seattle. You can read about the specifics here.Read More
Are Your Job Candidates Lying? Complimentary Webinar
July 14, 2014
Last month, we had a lively panel discussion on how to combat resume fraud through effective employment background screening techniques featuring experts from EmployeeScreenIQ as well as Karen Jones from the “Taj Majal” of all grocery chains, Wegmans (if you’ve ever been to one you know what I’m talking about) and employment verification guru, Craig Caddell.
The presentation, “Liar, Liar, Pants on Fire: An Employer’s Guide to Effective Resume Verification,” was attended by more than 450 human resources professionals and includes a great Q & A at the end.Read More
Indiana Update: Criminal History Information That Might Be Reported to Employers
June 27, 2014
Effective July 1, 2014, Indiana has a new rule on what information “criminal history providers” can report in employment background checks. This latest version of Ind. Code § 24-4-18-6 makes a technical correction to the law and clears up a few things. Unlike previous versions of the statute, the new law allows reporting of non-conviction and pending records as long as the information is within the 7 year window required under the Fair Credit Reporting Act.
As it now reads, the law limits reporting of expunged records and sealed records—records that any compliant screening company wouldn’t give you anyway. It also prohibits reporting certain classes of felonies that have been reduced or converted to a misdemeanor, and creates a statutory cause of action for the intentional or “knowing” act of reporting an inaccurate record. (more…)Read More
A Candidate’s Bill of Rights: 12 Steps to Ensure Background Screening Compliance
June 16, 2014
How many blog posts have we spent reviewing regulatory legal actions, class action litigation, and general bad publicity caused by employers or their background screening companies for their less than compliant background check practices? In our opinion, way too many.
In addition, lost in much of the negative publicity is the fact that an overwhelming majority of employers like you (and accredited background screening companies like us) are doing things right when it comes to employee background checks.Read More
New Jersey Court Approves $870,000 Employment Background Check Settlement
June 2, 2014
If you’ve been paying attention to our blog for the last couple years, you’ll know that we’ve spent a considerable amount of time discussing the flurry of class action lawsuits brought against employers for failure to comply with the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA). And by no means are these cases for the feint of heart. Typically, we’ve seen settlements range from several hundred thousand dollars to tens of millions.
Well, apparently not everyone has gotten the memo, so if you are concerned about maintaining compliant background check practices, you’ll want to read on.Read More