Expediting Your Background Checks Through Electronic Signatures?
January 7, 2009
Let’s face it. We’re all looking for creative ways to speed up our daily tasks. We got Blackberrys so we could quickly respond to messages when we weren’t sitting at our computers. Instant messaging became en vogue when we didn’t want to take the time to write out a long email message. We even invented our own IM language because we didn’t have the time to write out complete words or sentences. Example: r u going 2 finish that project. That would b g8. L8er. Tks.
Those of us who focus on hiring and on-boarding are no different from the rest of society. We are constantly looking for solutions that allow us to expedite the hiring process and decrease the cost of processing applicants. One such method is the electronic job application which then populates the applicant tracking solution. The applicant simply fills out the application on-line and the data flows seamlessly without the need for duplicate data entry. This saves both time and money.
A Panacea for Background Checks, Right?
Now that the applicant’s personal data has been captured in the electronic application, wouldn’t it stand to reason that the background check process can become fully automated? Yes and No.
We all know that the Fair Credit Reporting Act mandates that our applicants’ must grant written authorization that allows us to conduct a background check. Traditionally, employers provide this document to job applicants and ask for a “wet” (traditional ink) signature on the document. This document is then filed away for proof of signature or sometimes faxed to the background screening provider for processing. So with all the technology available today, why can’t we just obtain consent electronically and move on?
The answer is that we can. The Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act was signed into law by President Bill Clinton in 2000 (both electronically and in ink), giving electronic contracts the same weight as those executed on paper (be it for background checks, or any other purpose). However, just because it made this form of consent lawful doesn’t mean that it mandated recognition of such signatures if both parties didn’t agree to the format.
A Fly in the Ointment
While employers are obligated to certify that they have received consent to conduct a background check, most services requested do not require a hard copy of the authorization form. However, when employers conduct employment, education or professional license verifications or access Motor Vehicle Records in a handful of states, it is rare when proof of signature is not required. Most employers and academic institutions will not release information without proof. And here’s where things can unravel with electronic signatures. This requires the requestor of information to fax a hard copy of the release to their screening provider and for the screener to fax it to the information provider, thus adding time and effort to the process.
In a recent study conducted by EmployeeScreenIQ , we submitted 500 electronic releases to past employers and academic institutions as proof of applicant consent. Only 45% of the time, were these signatures recognized and information provided. 55% percent of the time, the source of information refused to provide a response until a wet signature was faxed or scanned and emailed as proof. That means that 55% of the time, we had to go back to the requestor and ask for a hard copy of the signature. In each case, the requestor had to go back to the applicant and seek a wet signature. Once received, they had to fax or email the executed document. This of course, slowed down the process drastically and ran the risk of creating a negative impression on the job applicant.
- Academic institutions only accepted the electronic signature 41% of the time
- Employers only accepted the electronic signature 43% of the time
- Larger employers rejected the electronic signature far more often than small to mid-size employers
When Does The Electronic Signature Work?
If an employer does not conduct employment, education or professional license verifications or check Motor Vehicle Records in a handful of states, the electronic signature will do the trick. At the time the background check is conducted, the employer simply certifies that it has written authorization to conduct a background check. In this case, the electronic signature allows the process to be completely automated. No more faxing of releases. The electronically signed document is simply submitted with the other applicant information and seamlessly transferred to the background screening company. That document can then be fed electronically to the information source and the information sought can be returned by them in the same fashion. For those looking to cut down on paper, this has the added benefit of being an environmentally friendly process.
In 2008, the National Association of Professional Background Screeners (NAPBS) presented some helpful guidelines for utilizing electronic signatures.
- E-signature process should require the applicant to consent to electronic storage and submission
- Choices for consent should be stated in unambiguous terms (“I consent” & “I decline” vs. “send” or “submit”)
- Applicant should be informed of their right to withdraw consent and explain any conditions, consequences or fees that would result from such a withdrawal
- Provide explicit instructions for the applicant to request a copy of their record in non-electronic form (A Summary of Your Rights Under the FCRA)
- An electronic record should be retained and readily available for reproduction
- You should outline the hardware and software requirements for accessing and retaining the electronic records that the applicant is consenting to receive
How Do We Improve Recognition of E-Signatures?
Certainly as time goes on, more and more institutions will begin recognizing these signatures. But rather than wait for that time, organizations are getting more and more creative. One of our strategic ATS partners, MyStaffingPro, allows releases to be signed electronically with a mouse, rather than a checkbox. They are then able to catalog the signature and store it on file through a third party auditor for future authentication. Other advanced organizations obtain signatures through electronic pen. Both forms of electronic signature should significantly improve acceptance as most verifying institutions want to just see some form of a scribble.
The concept of developing a completely automated and paperless background screening process is right at our fingertips. For those that do not require verification services, electronic signature is a proven way to expedite the process and reduce the labor involved in requesting a background check. The process has not yet been perfected for those that do require verification services, but we are closer than ever to realizing success in this regard. We can’t make people recognize these signatures, but we will continue to innovate creative solutions until they do.
Nick Fishman is Chief Marketing Officer for Cleveland-based EmployeeScreenIQ , a best practices provider of employment screening services throughout the U.S. and worldwide. Nick can be reached at (800) 235-3954 ext. 441 or email@example.com.
Latest posts by admin (see all)
- SterlingBackcheck Acquires EmployeeScreenIQ, a Global Provider of Background Screening Services - November 3, 2015
- Many Employers Not in Compliance With EEOC Criminal Records Guidance, EmployeeScreenIQ Research Shows - October 21, 2015
- The EEOC’s Criminal Background Screening Guidance 3 Years Later - October 8, 2015