Background Screening Incoming College Students
We are seeing a mountain of advocates supporting the use of background checks on college students in the wake of tragedies at Virginia Tech and Northern Illinois. We are beginning to see evidence of universities at least considering the use of background checks and there is certainly no shortage of articles written on the topic. I found an article entitled “Wanted: Students, not felons” and I want to reiterate something I’ve said in the past: I’m not sure background checks are really going to help in the majority of cases.
Why? Consider that as a generalization, most incoming students are 17-18 years old. Unless they have committed crimes after turning 18 or were tried as adults for crimes committed before the age of 18, criminal records are going to be hard to find. Any juvenile convictions are sealed and cannot be reported. A school then has to ask itself what offenses deem a prospective student unfit to attend their university.
Here’s the deal. I guess as one who advocates the use of background checks in the corporate world, I can’t say that this endeavor would be useless. For there is the chance, that if one student with a violent past is prevented from admission, than the entire expenditure is worth it. I think universities just have to create reasonable expectations for what this will and will not prevent or accomplish.
Labels: Articles



1 Comments:
At March 6, 2008 2:02 PM ,
Natalie Beck said...
While I applaud the fact that school advocates are looking for better ways to protect their student body, I too have reservations about the advantages of background checking incoming students. Access to juvenile criminal records is extremely limited and I believe colleges and universities could have a hard time arguing their permissible purpose for such information (remember the old adage “everyone deserves a second chance”). It is also important to note that running a background check on the two individuals responsible for these school shootings would have been pointless; both shooters did not have a criminal history, only an extensive history of mental illness (and having access to a person’s medical records is a whole different ballgame). Perhaps these school advocates could address a few other issues in order to protect their student body, faculty, and staff. They could start by lobbying Capitol Hill for stricter laws on gun purchases, especially in regards to those diagnosed with a mental illness. Perhaps they could also beef up their Counseling Center programs and create open forums for students to address any problems going on in their lives. While conducting a background check on an incoming student seems like the easiest idea, it would offer no guarantee that tragedies like those at VA Tech and Northern Illinois would not happen again.
Post a Comment
<< Home